gwen (gwenix) wrote,

apparently, protesters for peace are a threat to national security,0,4873867.story?coll=nyc%2Dtopheadlines%2Dleft

No, seriously. I was hoping the reason to deny the protest's permit was like "We don't want to disturb businesses or hold up traffic" which is still lame, but at least it's a reason considering people's rights (just non-protesters vs protesters). No, they said security was the issue. Er, ok, so protesters marching for peace can somehow contain a terrorist or terrorist group that may walk up to the UN Building to detonate it when they wouldn't otherwise do it without SIXTY ZILLION COPS AROUND. And given the history of these things, you know people will march anyway, and now they'll just get arrested. It's like we don't have enough people in jail or something. Argh!

Edit later:

So, someone passed me this article on the subject:

While the writer and I are on opposite opinions on the war, we're in one mind about the freedom of speech. And I'm *so* glad I didn't read the Sun article. According to them, I'm treasonous. *sigh*

  • Upcoming Spring Concert for RCC!

    Hi folks! This Friday and Saturday (April 29 and 30) I'll be in the Renaissance City Choirs production of "Love of Nature, Nature of Love". I'm…

  • If Schroedinger called in a bug..

    Scenario: Schroedinger has a box with a verified dead cat in it. He hands the box to customer support of a company, who later hands him back that…

  • Pumpkin Pasta recipe

    I actually cooked a good meal the other night. Like, this is miraculous. Further, it was VERY low pointage for Weight Watchers, and incredibly…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded